石家庄学院学报

我国司法实践中的主流观点认为,无"涉外因素"的争议不得提交境外仲裁或境外机构仲裁,法院普遍将"涉外因素"的存在作为认定相关仲裁协议有效性的前提。该主流做法存在可商榷之处。基于国际化视野,应当正视仲裁协议的涉外性,从国际私法的角度确定涉外仲裁协议的准据法及有效性,并顺应仲裁国际化和现代化的需要,就我国仲裁法中关于仲裁协议有效性的规定予以修正。

The mainstream view in China's judicial practice holds that disputes without "foreign-related factors" shall not be submitted to overseas arbitration or arbitration by overseas institutions, and the courts generally take the existence of "foreign-related factors" as the premise to determine the validity of relevant arbitration agreements. This mainstream practice is open to discussion. From the perspective of internationalization, we should face up to the externality of the arbitration agreement, and determine the applicable law and validity of the foreign arbitration agreement from the perspective of private international law. According to the need of the internationalization and modernization of arbitration, the provisions on the validity of arbitration agreement in the arbitration law of China should be amended.