| 206 | 1 | 22 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
科举时代科举制度一直充当着历代政治官员选拔的主要机制。在这种机制下,具有一定的应举资格无疑是士子们参加科举考试的必要前提。通过考察科举时代应举资格的政策规定,发现作为一个维护社会稳定的制衡器,科举制度本身要时刻从属于社会的利益,同时应举资格的变化在一定程度上反映了政治、经济与文化教育随着社会发展而不断发生变化的趋向。
Abstract：Since the Imperial Examination system came into being in Sui and Tang Dynasties,it had been lasting for nearly 1 300 years in Chinese imperial history.It had used a series of exams as a tool to choose elites.So every dynasty had worked out different regulations and restrictions for intellectuals who prepared for exams.The study of the qualification of taking part in Imperial Examination could help understand and perceive the essence of Imperial Examination.Accordingly,we could see the changes in the social politics,economy and culture.
[1]于宝轩.皇朝蓄艾文编[M].上海:上海官书局,1903.
[2]刘海峰.科举学导论[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[3]杨学为.中国考试制度史资料选编[M].合肥:黄山书社,1992.
[4]谢青.中国考试制度史[M].合肥:黄山书社,1995.
[5]白寿彝.中国通史:第六卷[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
[6]刘昫.旧唐书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
[7]李林甫.唐六典[M].北京:中华书局,1992.
[8]王溥.唐会要[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1991.
[9]张仲礼.中国绅士——关于其在19世纪中国社会中作用的研究[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,1998.
[10]许嘉璐,章培恒,喻遂生.二十四史全译[M].上海:汉语大词典出版社,2004.
[11]马端临.文献通考[M].北京:商务印书馆,1936.
[12]瞿同祖.中国法律与中国社会[M].北京:中华书局,2003.
[13]何怀宏.选举社会及其终结[M].北京:三联书店,1998.
[14]王炳照,徐勇.中国科举制度研究[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,2002.
[15]陈康祺.郎潜纪闻初笔二笔三笔[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[16]胡珠生.陈虬集[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1992.
[17]新京报.科举百年[M].北京:同心出版社,2006.
[18]上海图书馆.汪康年师友书札[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
[19]胡珠生.宋恕集[M].北京:中华书局,1993.
[20]白居易.白居易集[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
基本信息:
中图分类号:D691.3
引用信息:
[1]石焕霞.科举时代应举资格探微[J].石家庄学院学报,2008,No.47(01):98-102.
2008-01-20
2008-01-20