| 1,119 | 2 | 42 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
李庄案凸显出的证据学问题值得拷问。本案中证人不出庭接受质证难以形成以证人证言为核心的证据锁链;而品格证据的不规范运用,不但不利于保障被告人合法权益,还徒增了司法的不严肃性;司法主体对刑事证明责任分配的不恰当理解,以"武断"式的刑事证明标准表现出来。构建关键证人出庭作证制度与品格证据规则,以实用主义的态度赋予辩方制约法官自由心证的权利,方能有望贯彻落实刑事证明标准与刑事证明责任分配制度,以期真正实现刑事审判解决纠纷的功能,树立刑事司法权威。
Abstract：The evidence of Li Zhuang case is worthwhile research in the criminal trial.In this case,the witness does not appear to accept the cross-examination.It is difficult to form evidence chain around the core of witness testimony.The non-standard use of character evidence does not protect the defendant's rights.Moreover,it damages the seriousness of justice.Judicial body inappropriately comprehends the burden of proof result in the criminal standard of proof of "arbitrary" type.The construction of key witnesses and the character evidence rules can implement the criminal standard of proof and the criminal proof responsibility allotment.We should give the defense rights to restrict the free proof of judge according to the pragmatism.This can truly resolve the dispute in criminal trials functions and establish the criminal justice authority.
④毫无根据的驳回辩护人申请调取重庆一中院审理龚刚模案的庭审录像。须知,该视听资料能直观的展示和证明龚刚模是否被刑讯逼供、是否被敲诈、是否翻供、是否是黑社会老大,这些事实和被告人陈述与本案密切相关;无视辩护人在二审提供的江北区看守所有验收合格的录音录像监控系统,以调取不能为由,放任专案组拒绝提供视听资料;无视侦查机关在监督李庄会见时录像固定证据的事实,拒不调取录像。参见高子程:《李庄案二审补充辩护词》。
⑤参见李庄案《刑事一审判决书》。
[1]王子且.李庄案:请用法治细节证明“铁案”[EB/OL].(2010-01-04)[2010-07-09].http://www.eiiq.com/20100104/40026_1.html.
[2]李庄案二审讯问证人笔录[EB/OL].(2010-02-08)[2010-07-09].http://www.mykh.net/viewarticle.php?id=435284.
[3]龙宗智.李庄案法理研判——主要从证据学的角度[J].法学,2010,(2):3-13.
[4]仲卫东,曲秀岩.论美国刑事诉讼中被告人的品格证据排除规则[J].理论学习,2008,(9):23-24.
[5]李庄嫖娼信息解析[EB/OL].(2010-01-04)[2010-05-23].http://bbs.news.qq.com/b-1001024024/138215.htm.
[6]田磊.法学家称律师和民众等四方对李庄案缺乏反省[EB/OL].(2009-12-31)[2010-05-23].http://news.sina.com.cn/c/sd/2009-12-31/151019377550.shtml.
[7]关于《中国青年报》在“李庄”一案上的报道[EB/OL].(2010-01-01)[2010-05-23].http://wenwen.soso.com/z/q172624211.htm.
[8]李子煊,王进.美国品格证据规则及其借鉴意义[J].安徽理工大学学报,2006,(9):91-94.
[9]陈卫东,刘计划.关于完善我国刑事证明标准体系的若干思考[J].法律科学,2001,(3):60-72.
[10]龙宗智.印石王与自由心石王——我国刑事诉讼证明模式[J].法学研究,2004,(2):107-115.
[11]罗军.发生在重庆江北看守所的疑问[EB/OL].(2010-01-08)[2010-6-11].http://www.dzwww.com/rollnews/news/201001/t20100108_5414031.htm.
[12]李庄案[EB/OL].(2010-12-25)[2011—01-19].http://baike.baidu.com/view/3126844.htm.
[13]张晓晖.李庄案二审质证实录(警察吴鹏)[EB/OL].(2010-02-05)[2010-06-09].http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4e9a31b80100gy86.html.
[14]律坛怪侠对李庄助理马晓军律师不愿意出庭作证的法律解读[EB/OL].(2010-03-23)[2010-06-02].http://apps.hi.baidu.com/share/detail/2493419.
[15]李庄案二审实录[EB/OL].(2010-2-4)[2010-5-9].http://fi-nance.ifeng.com/roll/20100204/1798652.shtml.
[16]李律师可以不打黑社会,不可以打黑官司[EB/OL].(2010-02-07)[2010-05-09].http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/jueqi/166156995.html
[17]宋英辉,汤维建.我国证据制度的理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2006.
[18]黄东熊.刑事诉讼法论[M].台北:三民书局,1999.
[19]黄维智.合理疑点与疑点排除——兼论刑事诉讼证明责任的分配理论[J].法学,2006,(7):153-160.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2011.02.019
中图分类号:D925.2
引用信息:
[1]庄乾龙.李庄案的证据学拷问[J].石家庄学院学报,2011,13(02):29-36.DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2011.02.019.
2011-03-20
2011-03-20