nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 04, v.26 138-144+153
思政视角下的优秀高校外语教师课堂积极话语分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金一般项目“干扰范式下二语情绪加工中的续写作用研究”(23BYY169); 江苏师范大学研究生科研创新计划项目“基于职业锚理论的职业技术人才性别话语分析”(2024XKT0797); 浙江省级平台校级教学项目“基于续写的外语思政教材建构研究”(1070JYN6523004G-11)
邮箱(Email): suminzhang@zjgsu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2024.04.012
发布时间: 2024-07-18
出版时间: 2024-07-18
移动端阅读
摘要:

采用课堂观察法和语料库驱动法,从课程思政视角分析同种课型和不同课型间外语教师课堂积极话语建构异同。将20名“外教社杯”全国高校外语教学大赛教学大赛获奖教师分为综合课组和视听说课组,对比不同参赛年份和课程组别的教师思政话语频次和维度发现:外语教师思政育人的自觉性不断提高;不同课型的教师课堂积极话语建构存在差异,综合课组教师的积极话语频次显著高于视听说课组;教师的积极话语大多为思想素质维度;积极话语数量不是教学效果的决定因素;授课主题影响教师课堂积极话语的维度分布。研究表明:相关政策引导是教师思政意识的助推剂,而课程内容是课程思政的重要前提,但受到课程类型和单元主题的影响。

Abstract:

This study employs classroom observation and corpus-driven methodologies to analyze the similarities and differences in the positive discourse construction of foreign language teachers between the same course type and different course types from the perspective of curriculum-based ideological-political education. The comprehensive course group and the audio-visual speaking course group are two categories into which the 20 award-winning teachers of the SFLEP National Foreign Language Teaching Contest are divided. A comparison of the frequency and dimensions of ideological and political discourse across different years and course groups reveals that foreign language teachers are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of ideological and political education. There are differences in the way teachers construct positive discourse across different course types, and the frequency of positive discourse is significantly higher for teachers in the comprehensive course group than for those in the audiovisual speaking course. The comprehensive course group exhibited a higher level of discourse than the audio-visual speaking course. The ideological quality dimension is the primary focus of teachers' positive discourse. The quantity of teachers' positive discourse is not a determining factor in teaching effectiveness. Thematic considerations influence the distribution of positive discourse among instructors. The research indicates that relevant policy guidance is a booster for teachers' ideological-political awareness, while course content is a prerequisite for curriculum-based ideological-political education. However, the influence of the course type and the subject matter of the unit must be considered.

参考文献

[1]邱伟光.课程思政的价值意蕴与生成路径[J].思想理论教育,2017,(7):10-14.

[2]秦丽莉,赵迎旭,高洋,等.社会文化理论指导的大学英语课程思政教学有效性研究路径[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2023,46(1):78-86+161.

[3]李华.从话语分析理论的发展看国内教师话语的研究[J].外语界,2007,(5):83-90.

[4] NUNAN D. Language Teaching Methodology:A Textbook for Teachers[M]. London:Prentice Hall, 1991.

[5]杨金才.新时代外语教育课程思政建设的几点思考[J].外语教学,2020,41(6):11-14.

[6]张鹏君.课堂教学中教师话语表达的审视与反思[J].教育理论与实践,2019,39(25):40-43.

[7]韩礼德.语言与教育[M].刘承宇,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.

[8] ELLIS R. Study on Second Language Acquisition[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1994.

[9]贾爱武.语言课堂话语模式的分析与改进[J].解放军外国语学院学报,1999,(4):72-73.

[10]戚亚军,庄智象.课堂话语研究的范式演进与实践转型———从“会话”走向“对话”[J].外语教学,2017,38(6):52-57.

[11] COULTAS V. Case Studies of Teachers'Understandings of the Pedagogy of Classroom Talk:Some Critical Moments Explored[J]. Literacy, 2015, 50(1):32-39.

[12] TAJEDDIN Z, KAMALI J. Typology of Scaffolding in Teacher Discourse:Large Data Based Evidence from Second Language Classrooms[J]. International Journal of Applied Linguistics,2020, 30(2):329-343.

[13]咸修斌,孙晓丽.自然模式亦或教学模式———基于大学英语优秀教师课堂话语语料的分析[J].外语与外语教学,2007,(5):37-41.

[14] CHASE C C, MARKS J, MALKIEWICH L J, et al. How Teacher talk Guidance During Invention Activities Shapes Students'Cognitive Engagement and Transfer[J]. International Journal of Stem Education, 2019, 6(14):14-36.

[15] MARTIN J R. Positive Discourse Analysis:Solidarity and Change[J]. The Journal of English Studies, 2006, 4(4):21-35.

[16]张德禄,张珂.多模态批评(积极)话语分析综合框架探索[J].外语教学,2022,43(1):1-8.

[17]胡壮麟.积极话语分析和批评话语分析的互补性[J].当代外语研究,2012,(7):3-8+76.

[18]苗兴伟,赵云.批评话语分析的议程设置与路径演进[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2019,42(5):1-10+159.

[19] CAP P. Applying Cognitive Pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies:A Proximization Analysis of Three PublicSpace Discourses[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2014, 70(11):16-30.

[20] CHILTON P. Analysing Political Discourse:Theory and Practice[M]. London:Routledge, 2004.

[21]张敬源,王娜.外语“课程思政”建设——内涵、原则与路径探析[J].中国外语,2020,17(5):15-20+29.

[22]文秋芳.大学外语课程思政的内涵和实施框架[J].中国外语,2021,18(2):47-52.

[23]张文霞,赵华敏,胡杰辉.大学外语教师课程思政教学能力现状及发展需求研究[J].外语界,2022,(3):28-36.

[24]胡萍萍,刘雯静.大学英语教师课程思政教学能力现状调查[J].外语电化教学,2022,(5):11-17+106.

[25]罗良功.外语专业课程思政的本、质、量[J].中国外语,2021,18(2):60-64.

[26]黄国文.思政视角下的英语教材分析[J].中国外语,2020,17(5):21-29.

[27]鲁洁,王逢贤.德育新论[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2000.

[28]刘正光,岳曼曼.转变理念、重构内容,落实外语课程思政[J].外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2020,43(5):21-29.

[29]秦洪武,孔蕾.外语教育思政资源高效应用探索:数字化途径[J].外语电化教学,2023,(4):65-72+122.

[30]曾艳钰.《英语专业本科教学指南》解读[J].外语界,2019,(6):2-8.

[31]张素敏,任宇红.二语信息加工中的社会情感认知[M].北京:科学出版社,2024.

[32]杨伊,陈昌来,陈兴冶.基于多模态语料库的教师话语分析:缘起、内涵及效力[J].教师教育研究,2023,35(2):30-36.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2024.04.012

中图分类号:H09

引用信息:

[1]童欣安,张素敏.思政视角下的优秀高校外语教师课堂积极话语分析[J].石家庄学院学报,2024,26(04):138-144+153.DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2024.04.012.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金一般项目“干扰范式下二语情绪加工中的续写作用研究”(23BYY169); 江苏师范大学研究生科研创新计划项目“基于职业锚理论的职业技术人才性别话语分析”(2024XKT0797); 浙江省级平台校级教学项目“基于续写的外语思政教材建构研究”(1070JYN6523004G-11)

发布时间:

2024-07-18

出版时间:

2024-07-18

检 索 高级检索