| 289 | 5 | 41 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以调查宿州市土壤的重金属污染状况数据为基础,按照有关标准和方法,对宿州市土壤重金属潜在生态风险进行了评价.结果表明:宿州市土壤中Cu,Zn,Cr,Cd,Hg,Pb,As 7种重金属含量都存在着一定幅度的变化,矿区土壤单因子污染指数Hg,Cr为重度污染、Cd,As轻度污染水平,耕地除Hg,Cr有部分超标外,其他重金属含量均达标;28.57%的土壤属于安全等级,32.86%的土壤属于警戒线,7.14%的土壤属于轻污染,2.86%的土壤属于中污染,28.57%的土壤属于重污染;67.14%的土壤属于低风险等级,5.71%的土壤属于中等风险等级,强风险等级土壤占15.72%,很强风险等级土壤占11.43%,而属于强风险、很强风险等级土壤都是矿区土壤,耕地均属于低风险等级;土壤中7种重金属对污染的贡献大小顺序为:Hg>Cr>Cd>As>Cu>Zn>Pb.
Abstract:The potential ecological risk of heavy metals in soil was evaluated based on the related standards and methods and the investigation of heavy metal pollution status in soil of Suzhou.The results show that the changes in content of Cu,Zn,Cr,Cd,Hg,Pb,as in soil of Suzhou were found.Mine soil single factor pollution index of Hg and Cr reached a high level of pollution while that of Cd stayed at a low level.The heavy metal content in paddy land reached the standard except the content of Hg and Cr.28.75% of soil belonged to safe grade,32.86% of soil reached the warning line,7.14% of soil reached the slight pollution level,2.86% of soil reached the moderate pollution level,and 28.57% of soil was heavy pollution area.67.14% of soil in Suzhou was at the low risk level of potential ecological risk index,5.71% of soil was at the middle risk level,15.72% of soil was at the strong risk level,and 11.43% of soil was at very strong level.Mine soil was all at the strong risk and very strong risk while paddy land was at low risk level.The contribution to pollution of heavy metals in soil was in an order of Hg> Cr> Cd> As> Cu> Zn> Pb.
[1]QUEROL X,ALASTUEY A,ZHUANG X,et al.Petrology,Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Permian and Triassic Coals in theLeping area,Jiangxi Province,Southeast China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2001,48:23-45.
[2]CLARK M W,WALSH S R,SMITH J V.The Distribution of Heavy Metals in an Abandoned Mining Area;A Case Study of Strauss Pit,the Drake Mining Area,Australia:Implications for the Environmental Management of Mine Sites[J].Environmental Geology,2001,40(6):655-663.
[3]李章平,陈玉成,杨学春,等.重庆市主城区土壤重金属的潜在生态危害评价[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(27):227-230.
[4]安中华,董元华,安琼,等.苏南某市农田土壤环境质量评价及其分级[J].土壤,2004,36(6):631-635.
[5]徐友宁,柯海玲,赵阿宁,等.小秦岭某金矿区农田土壤重金属污染评价[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4):732-735.
[6]吉玉碧,谢锋,谭红,等.基于GIS的贵州省农业土壤环境质量评价[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(1):15-17.
[7]丛源,陈岳龙,杨忠芳,等.北京市农田土壤重金属的化学形态及其对生态系统的潜在危害[J].土壤,2009,41(1):37-41.
[8]王济,张浩,曾希柏,等.贵阳市城区土壤重金属分布特征及污染评价[J].土壤,2010,42(6):928-934.
[9]李伊胜,吴文晖,李佩耕等.张家界市耕地土壤重金属污染状况分析及评价[J].中国环境监测,2009,25(6):107-111.
[10]HJ/T166-2004,土壤环境监测技术规范[S].
[11]HAKANSON L.An Ecology risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control:A Sedimentological Approach[J].Water Research,1980,14(8):975-1001.
[12]徐争启,倪师军,庹先国,等.潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J].环境科学与技术,2008,31(2):112-115.
[13]侯晓龙,黄建国,刘爱琴.福建闽江河口湿地土壤重金属污染特征及评价研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(11):2302-2306.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2012.03.009
中图分类号:X820.4;X833
引用信息:
[1]张春丽,袁新田.宿州市土壤重金属含量分布及其潜在生态风险评价[J].石家庄学院学报,2012,14(03):9-14+42.DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2012.03.009.
基金信息:
安徽高校省级自然科学研究项目(KJ2011B174);; 安徽高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2010A315)
2012-05-15
2012-05-15
2012-05-15