nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 02, v.26 48-54
国内民事诉讼律师调查令制度建设存在的若干问题探讨
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2024.02.017
发布时间: 2024-03-15
出版时间: 2024-03-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

我国法院经过不断探索,建立了律师调查令制度。目前,律师调查令制度存在着需要进一步完善的若干问题。律师持令调查行为的性质、调查令申请条件、听取证据持有人意见、调查令跨省适用等若干方面均有必要进一步厘清或改进。关于律师持令调查行为的性质,需要在“公的性质”基础上,从证据持有人维护司法秩序义务之角度加以审视。调查令的申请条件有必要取消“因客观原因无法自行调查收集证据”的规定,避免制度上的逻辑性矛盾。应当建立听取证据持有人意见的程序,维护证据持有人的合法权益。律师调查令制度应当允许跨省适用,提高律师证据调查收集的效率与实效性。

Abstract:

After continuous exploration, Chinese courts have established a lawyer investigation writ system.At present, there are several issues that need to be further improved in the system of lawyer investigation writ.Several aspects of the nature of lawyer's investigation writ behavior, investigation writ application, listening to evidence holders, and cross provincial application of lawyer investigation writ must be further clarified or improved. The nature of the lawyer's investigation writ investigation behavior needs to be examined from the perspective of the obligation of evidence holders to maintain judicial order, based on the "public right". It is necessary to cancel the provision that "due to objective reasons, it is impossible to conduct self-investigation and collect evidence" in order to avoid logical contradictions in the system. A procedure should be established to listen to the opinions of evidence holders and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. The system of lawyer investigation writ should allow cross provincial application to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of lawyer evidence investigation and collection.

参考文献

[1]陈颖婷.律师调查令如何“畅行无阻”[N].上海法治报,2022-08-31(8).

[2]赵风暴.民事证据调查令制度的司法适用路径探析[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2018,46(3):83-91.

[3]靳建丽,王丹.民事诉讼中律师调查令制度的运行困境与完善路径[J].重庆科技学院(社会科学版),2023,(2):24-30.

[4]靳建丽,祝祎.民事证据调查令制度的检视与完善[J].太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2020,19(2):85-91.

[5]哈书菊.张书博民事案件律师调查取证权的困境与路径[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(1):30-35.

[6]陈莉.民事诉讼中律师调查令的制度实践与优化[J].人民司法,2019,(28):63-66.

[7]韦杨,曾俊怡,刘亚玲.当事人调査取证权之程序保障的路径尝试——以调査令制度的检讨及其实证量化分析为研究视点[J].法律适用,2008,(3):18-22.

[8]汤啸天,张进德,金晨,等.调查令制度的法律属性与完善建议[J].法律适用,2008,(7):74-78.

[9]王杏飞,刘洋.论我国民事诉讼中的律师调查令[J].法治研究,2017,(3):118-130.

[10]胡铭,赵青航.律师持令取证的实践现状与制度构建——以浙江省为例的实证研究[J].浙江社会科学,2022,(3):58-68.

[11]包冰锋.我国书证提出命令制度构造的反思与调整[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,50(3):110-120.

[12]郑返.协作式取证模式视角下律师调查令制度的构建路径[J].韩山师范学院学报,2021,42(2):80-86.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2024.02.017

中图分类号:D926.5;D925.1

引用信息:

[1]陶建国,陈鹏.国内民事诉讼律师调查令制度建设存在的若干问题探讨[J].石家庄学院学报,2024,26(02):48-54.DOI:10.13573/j.cnki.sjzxyxb.2024.02.017.

发布时间:

2024-03-15

出版时间:

2024-03-15

检 索 高级检索