石家庄学院学报

对形而上学基础上的技术概念进行细致考究后，海德格尔发现人类以往对技术的中立性看法对探究技术并无益处。海德格尔批判了形而上学对于技术的理解，提出技术之本质为座架。作为一种支配性力量，座架迫使自然和人类进入预定框架，将世间一切降格为“持存物”，导致人和世界的关系变得工具化。针对此困境，海德格尔提出了救渡之路。随着时代的发展，人类仍需要在海德格尔现代技术本质与救渡之思的基础上进一步思考,主动成为技术的“看护者”，与技术的关系从“使用者”转变为“对话者”，永葆对存在的谦卑。这种姿态的转换，才是当代人对抗技术异化的终极救渡之路。

After a meticulous examination of the concept of technology rooted in metaphysics, Martin Heidegger argues that the traditional view of technology as neutral offers little benefit to humanity's inquiry into technology. He criticizes the metaphysical understanding of technology and proposed that the essence of technology lies in Ge-stell(Enframing). As a dominating force, Enframing compels nature and humanity into a predetermined framework,reducing all entities in the world to "standing-reserve"(Bestand) and instrumentalizing the relationship between humans and the world. To address this predicament, Heidegger puts forward a path of salvation(Rettung). With the advancement of the times, humanity still needs to further reflect on the basis of Heidegger's thoughts on the essence of modern technology and the path of salvation, proactively becoming "guardians" of technology, transforming the relationship with technology from "users" to "dialogists" and maintaining perpetual humility toward Being(Sein).This shift in posture constitutes the ultimate path of salvation for contemporary humans to resist technological alienation.