石家庄学院学报

长期以来，司法机关对于互殴案件中正当防卫的认定过于苛刻，将许多本属正当防卫的行为认定为违法犯罪，导致该类案件的正当防卫认定率极低。传统互殴概念过于宽泛、正当防卫指导性认定规则适用不足以及被害人过错的认定失范，是此类正当防卫认定阙如的主要原因。互殴案件中存在正当防卫的认定空间，应当对互殴作实质限缩解释，更合理解读正当防卫的认定要件，加强指导性规则的理解与适用，并对不同互殴案件中正当防卫的认定规则作差异化设置，以强化互殴案件中正当防卫的认定。

For a long time, judicial organs have adopted overly strict standards in determining justifiable defense in mutual combat cases, classifying many acts that should be considered justifiable defense as illegal or criminal offenses. This has resulted in an extremely low rate of justifiable defense recognition in such cases. The main reasons for the lack of justifiable defense determination in these cases lie in three: the overly broad scope of the traditional concept of mutual combat, insufficient application of guiding rules for justifiable defense identification,and irregularities in determining the victim's fault. There is room for identifying justifiable defense in mutual combat cases. Therefore, it is necessary to make a substantive restrictive interpretation of mutual combat, interpret the elements for determining justifiable defense in a more reasonable manner, strengthen the understanding and application of guiding rules, and set differentiated rules for determining justifiable defense in different mutual combat cases, enhancing the identification of justifiable defense in mutual combat cases.